British Columbia - Documents - Frontier

1903 Debate on Construction of Grand Trunk Railway

Placeholder image

1903 Debate on Construction of Grand Trunk Railway

Date: 1903

Source: Parliament, House of Commons, Debates, 28 August 1903, 10023, 10029

The Grand Trunk Railway was a major railway system in Canada that was constructed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1903, there was a debate in the Canadian Parliament about the construction of the railway, which was controversial at the time.

The debate centered around the cost and benefits of the railway, as some argued that the construction of the railway would be too expensive and would not provide sufficient economic benefits to justify the cost. Others argued that the railway was necessary for the economic development of the country and that the benefits would outweigh the costs in the long run.

Supporters of the railway argued that it would provide a faster and more efficient means of transportation for goods and people, which would stimulate economic growth and development. They also pointed out that the railway would connect the country from coast to coast, which would improve national unity and help to secure the country's borders.

Opponents of the railway argued that the cost of the project was too high and that the government should focus on other priorities, such as social programs and infrastructure improvements in urban areas. They also argued that the railway would primarily benefit the wealthy and that the costs would be borne by the working class.

Despite these debates, the Grand Trunk Railway was eventually constructed and played a significant role in the development of Canada's economy and transportation system.

Mr Davis (Saskatchewan) [Liberal Member of Parliament]

Now, as to the necessity of this road, as I said before, I do not think it needs any argument whatever. The people of that country have farmed on shares, so to speak, with the Canadian Pacific Railway Company for twenty-three years. Those hon. gentlemen who make speeches in this House on this question allude to the grand scheme that was put through by the Conservative party, and the hon. member for Marquette alluded to it as the pioneer of progress in that country. Pioneer of progress! Why, Sir, that scheme has had the effect of keeping that country back for twenty- three years, and I say here without fear of contradiction that if the advice of the Liberal party, when that scheme was put through this House, had been taken, and the road had been laid out as proposed by the Liberal party through the northern portion of that country, and built where this road is going at the present time, in place of the 300,000 people in that country, we would now have two or three millions; I say that without fear of contradiction. When this bargain was going through that these gentlemen talk so much about, the Liberal party then, as they are to-day, were well seized of the people's needs; and if their advice had been followed we would have seen a different state of things in the North-west, and there would not have been such a crying necessity for this road as there is at the present time.

....

I have pointed out that we pay freight rates twice or three times as high as the freight rates that are paid in the east. Now we are getting people into that country and hon. gentlemen opposite are trying to take credit for it; they say that thanks to the policy of the Conservative party immigration is coming into the country. Think of it. For eighteen years, until 1896, the people there were on the verge of starvation and when we brought a few people into the country by one railway they dodged out by another.

...

And to-day they will tell you that they brought about prosperity that now prevails there. The hon. member for Marquette (Mr. Roche), for instance, in an eloquent peroration referred to the buffalo and the red men that once roamed on the western plains. If these gentlemen had been kept in power another seven years we would have had the red men back on the plains -- the buffalo are extinct practically and could not be got on the plains but the red men would have possession. The other settlers would have been starved out. The idea of these gentlemen talking about their having assisted to bring about the prosperity we enjoy at the present time in western Canada. They had as much to do with it as they had in creating the universe...


Cite Article : www.britsihcolumbiahistory.ca.com/sections/documents

Source: Parliament, House of Commons, Debates, 28 August 1903, 10023, 10029

Reference: Article by (Staff Historian), 2023

i

History & Heritage

Tel: 1 604 833-9488

Email: info@canadahistorysociety.ca

Access History creates and posts content, articles, and subject matter relating to history and heritage
Copyright 2025 to Access history. All rights reserved and images and logos are created and presented for the general use of the public and educational institutions All content is the responsibility of Access.
Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Access terms and conditions
Placeholder image

All content and images are protected by copyright to Access History